DTEC vs. RFFC
DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) and RFFC (ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while RFFC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SS&C. DTEC is passively managed, while RFFC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTEC returned 2.70%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for RFFC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for RFFC.
Performance
DTEC vs. RFFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than RFFC's 11.11% return.
DTEC
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- —
RFFC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- —
DTEC vs. RFFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 6.02% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 4.89% | 44.12% | 35.44% | -4.96% |
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 11.11% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTEC and RFFC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DTEC and RFFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTEC vs. RFFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTEC
RFFC
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
DTEC
RFFC
Industrials
DTEC
RFFC
Healthcare
DTEC
RFFC
Financial Services
DTEC
RFFC
Energy
DTEC
RFFC
Utilities
DTEC
RFFC
Communication Services
DTEC
RFFC
Real Estate
DTEC
RFFC
Consumer Cyclical
DTEC
RFFC
Basic Materials
DTEC
-
RFFC
Consumer Defensive
DTEC
-
RFFC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTEC vs. RFFC — Risk / Return Rank
DTEC
RFFC
DTEC vs. RFFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTEC | RFFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 2.48 | -1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 3.49 | -2.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.44 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 3.23 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 14.90 | -13.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTEC | RFFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.48 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.78 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.71 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
DTEC vs. RFFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, which is greater than RFFC's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and RFFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTEC | RFFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.00% | -36.26% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -9.25% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -18.45% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.00% | -22.29% | -19.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -0.07% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -5.02% | -8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 2.01% | +6.69% |
Volatility
DTEC vs. RFFC - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) at 3.03%. This indicates that DTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTEC | RFFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 3.03% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 9.33% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 11.98% | +6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 16.27% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 17.97% | +4.90% |
DTEC vs. RFFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RFFC's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTEC vs. RFFC - Dividend Comparison
DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than RFFC's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTEC and RFFC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTEC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to RFFC (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs RFFC's -36.26%.
On 5-year performance, RFFC leads with 12.68% vs 2.70% for DTEC. On fees, RFFC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RFFC has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RFFC has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFFC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTEC.
RFFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.03% for DTEC.
DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while RFFC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.48% for RFFC.
RFFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTEC and RFFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer