PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTEC vs. RFCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTEC vs. RFCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than RFCI's 0.35% return.


DTEC

1D
-0.57%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
-2.38%
3Y*
7.03%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*

RFCI

1D
0.11%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.55%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTEC vs. RFCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
-4.66%7.21%9.89%25.03%-31.29%4.89%44.12%35.44%-4.96%0.04%
RFCI
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
0.35%6.85%2.64%5.97%-9.27%-1.48%6.48%8.69%-1.30%0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DTEC and RFCI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.17

The correlation between DTEC and RFCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTEC vs. RFCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTEC
DTEC Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

RFCI
RFCI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
RFCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTEC vs. RFCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTECRFCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.20

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

1.49

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

4.24

-4.50

DTEC vs. RFCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the RFCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTEC and RFCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTEC vs. RFCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, which is greater than RFCI's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and RFCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTECRFCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.00%

-14.18%

-27.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.31%

-2.65%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-5.10%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.00%

-13.46%

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.18%

-1.16%

-11.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-3.22%

-10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.99%

0.93%

+8.06%

Volatility

DTEC vs. RFCI - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) at 1.00%. This indicates that DTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTECRFCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

1.00%

+7.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

2.69%

+12.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

3.52%

+15.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.17%

5.13%

+17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

4.94%

+17.94%

DTEC vs. RFCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RFCI's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTEC vs. RFCI - Dividend Comparison

DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than RFCI's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
0.04%0.04%0.45%0.27%0.02%0.26%0.37%0.43%0.33%0.00%0.00%
RFCI
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
4.55%4.55%4.30%3.55%2.26%3.45%2.04%2.66%2.76%2.03%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTEC and RFCI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTEC has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to RFCI (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs RFCI's -14.18%.

On 5-year performance, RFCI leads with 1.21% vs -0.77% for DTEC. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFCI has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFCI has performed better with a 1.21% return vs -0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.

RFCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 0.04% for DTEC.

DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while RFCI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.54% for RFCI.

RFCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTEC and RFCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer