DTEC vs. RFCI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) and RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while RFCI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by SS&C. DTEC is passively managed, while RFCI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTEC returned 1.86%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for RFCI. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for RFCI.

Performance

DTEC vs. RFCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly higher than RFCI's 0.13% return.

DTEC

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: 3.04%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 9.62%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: —

RFCI

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTEC vs. RFCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF	3.04%	7.21%	9.89%	25.03%	-31.29%	4.89%	44.12%	35.44%	-4.96%
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF	0.13%	6.85%	2.64%	5.97%	-9.27%	-1.48%	6.48%	8.69%	-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DTEC and RFCI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018	0.17

The correlation between DTEC and RFCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DTEC vs. RFCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTEC

DTEC Risk / Return Rank: 12
DTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
DTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 12
DTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
DTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 12

RFCI

RFCI Risk / Return Rank: 36
RFCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RFCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RFCI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RFCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RFCI Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTEC vs. RFCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTEC	RFCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	1.31	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	1.88	-1.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.23	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	1.74	-1.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	5.23	-4.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTEC vs. RFCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the RFCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTEC and RFCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTEC	RFCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	1.31	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.24	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.42	-0.04

Drawdowns

DTEC vs. RFCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, which is greater than RFCI's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and RFCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTEC	RFCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.00%	-14.18%	-27.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.31%	-2.65%	-17.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.47%	-5.10%	-16.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.00%	-13.46%	-28.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-1.38%	-3.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-3.23%	-10.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.71%	0.88%	+7.83%

Volatility

DTEC vs. RFCI - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) at 1.29%. This indicates that DTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTEC	RFCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.58%	1.29%	+5.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.30%	2.70%	+11.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	3.53%	+14.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.07%	5.13%	+16.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	4.95%	+17.94%

DTEC vs. RFCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RFCI's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTEC vs. RFCI - Dividend Comparison

DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than RFCI's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF	0.04%	0.04%	0.45%	0.27%	0.02%	0.26%	0.37%	0.43%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF	4.54%	4.55%	4.30%	3.55%	2.26%	3.45%	2.04%	2.66%	2.76%	2.03%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTEC and RFCI in my portfolio?

DTEC and RFCI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTEC or RFCI?

DTEC has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to RFCI (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs RFCI's -14.18%.

Which ETF is better, DTEC or RFCI?

On 5-year performance, DTEC leads with 1.86% vs 1.22% for RFCI. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFCI has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DTEC or RFCI?

Over the 5-year period, DTEC has performed better with a 1.86% return vs 1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DTEC or RFCI?

DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DTEC or RFCI?

RFCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.04% for DTEC.

What is the main difference between DTEC and RFCI?

DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while RFCI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.54% for RFCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.