DTEC vs. ENCG.L
DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) and ENCG.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while ENCG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DTEC returned 9.62%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for ENCG.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENCG.L.
Performance
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DTEC is traded in USD, while ENCG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ENCG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than ENCG.L's 25.91% return.
DTEC
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ENCG.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 25.91%
- 6M
- 25.11%
- 1Y
- 34.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 3.04% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 0.70% |
ENCG.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 25.91% | 8.50% | 3.63% | -2.97% | 23.40% | 13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTEC and ENCG.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between DTEC and ENCG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTEC
ENCG.L
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Technology
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Industrials
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Healthcare
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Financial Services
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Energy
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Utilities
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Communication Services
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Real Estate
DTEC
ENCG.L
Consumer Cyclical
DTEC
ENCG.L
-
Basic Materials
DTEC
-
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DTEC
-
ENCG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTEC vs. ENCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
DTEC
ENCG.L
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTEC | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 2.09 | -1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.52 | 2.65 | -2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 5.32 | -5.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 12.13 | -11.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTEC | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 2.09 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.78 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, which is greater than ENCG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and ENCG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTEC | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.00% | -23.60% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.31% | -6.49% | -13.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.47% | -12.41% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -2.96% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -12.38% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.71% | 2.85% | +5.86% |
Volatility
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) have volatilities of 6.58% and 6.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTEC | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 6.34% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 13.79% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 16.51% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 18.40% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 18.40% | +4.49% |
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ENCG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTEC vs. ENCG.L - Dividend Comparison
DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while ENCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% |
ENCG.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTEC and ENCG.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENCG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENCG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTEC.
DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while ENCG.L is Commodities. DTEC tracks Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while ENCG.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.30% for ENCG.L.
Find the right allocation for DTEC and ENCG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer