DTDRX vs. FLTKX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DTDRX (Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) and FLTKX (Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, DTDRX returned 10.96%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for FLTKX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTDRX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for FLTKX.

Performance

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) and Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DTDRX having a 9.68% return and FLTKX slightly lower at 9.52%.

DTDRX

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: —

FLTKX

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DTDRX Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	9.68%	19.28%	17.13%	21.29%	-15.25%	20.99%	13.15%	0.00%
FLTKX Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund	9.52%	21.87%	16.05%	19.58%	-17.27%	17.56%	16.18%	0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DTDRX and FLTKX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019	0.94

The correlation between DTDRX and FLTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DTDRX vs. FLTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTDRX

DTDRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
DTDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DTDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DTDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
DTDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DTDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FLTKX

FLTKX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FLTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FLTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FLTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FLTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) and Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DTDRX	FLTKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	1.92	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.63	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.35	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.59	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	11.33	+1.81

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTDRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FLTKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTDRX and FLTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTDRX drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum FLTKX drawdown of -35.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTDRX and FLTKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTDRX	FLTKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.33%	-35.72%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.57%	-9.63%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	-15.73%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.47%	-35.72%	+12.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-2.48%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-7.14%	+2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.20%	-0.27%

Volatility

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) is 4.81%, while Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund (FLTKX) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that DTDRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTDRX	FLTKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	5.56%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	10.95%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	13.04%	-1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.98%	18.16%	-3.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.17%	16.68%	+2.49%

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTDRX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTKX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DTDRX vs. FLTKX - Dividend Comparison

DTDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FLTKX's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DTDRX Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	1.40%	1.31%	2.07%	1.94%	2.01%	1.53%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLTKX Franklin LifeSmart 2055 Retirement Target Fund	5.40%	5.86%	2.70%	2.31%	4.02%	19.28%	2.35%	2.08%	3.98%	0.54%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTDRX and FLTKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DTDRX and FLTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DTDRX or FLTKX?

FLTKX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to DTDRX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTDRX dropped -33.33% vs FLTKX's -35.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.