DTD vs. FUNL
DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DTD is passively managed, while FUNL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTD returned 11.75%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTD charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.
Performance
DTD vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.
DTD
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
FUNL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
DTD vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 10.02% | 14.25% | 18.56% | 10.63% | -3.83% | 26.26% | 11.29% |
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 5.66% | 14.62% | 15.55% | 14.33% | -5.76% | 25.93% | 14.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTD and FUNL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DTD and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTD vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTD
FUNL
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DTD
FUNL
Technology
DTD
FUNL
Healthcare
DTD
FUNL
Consumer Defensive
DTD
FUNL
Industrials
DTD
FUNL
Energy
DTD
FUNL
Communication Services
DTD
FUNL
Utilities
DTD
FUNL
Consumer Cyclical
DTD
FUNL
Real Estate
DTD
FUNL
Basic Materials
DTD
FUNL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTD vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank
DTD
FUNL
DTD vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTD | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.47 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 5.01 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | 23.31 | -8.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTD | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.19 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.63 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.95 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
DTD vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than FUNL's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and FUNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTD | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -19.35% | -38.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -3.83% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.41% | -17.37% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.14% | -19.35% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.12% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -3.54% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 0.82% | +0.70% |
Volatility
DTD vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTD | FUNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.13% | 0.00% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.98% | 5.24% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 8.82% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 15.16% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 15.29% | +0.92% |
DTD vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTD vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison
DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 1.87% | 1.99% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.50% | 2.93% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.81% |
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL | 2.25% | 2.10% | 1.78% | 1.69% | 1.84% | 1.55% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTD and FUNL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTD has higher volatility (2.13%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs FUNL's -19.35%.
On 5-year performance, DTD leads with 11.75% vs 9.42% for FUNL. On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTD has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.
FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.87% for DTD.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.50% for FUNL.
DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTD and FUNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer