DTCR vs. SIL
DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTCR returned 15.53%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for SIL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DTCR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
DTCR vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 52.56% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.75% return.
DTCR
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 52.56%
- 6M
- 54.49%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- -4.96%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 91.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
DTCR vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 52.56% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 5.81% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 4.75% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTCR and SIL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.37 |
DTCR vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTCR
SIL
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DTCR
SIL
-
Technology
DTCR
SIL
-
Communication Services
DTCR
SIL
-
Basic Materials
DTCR
-
SIL
Consumer Cyclical
DTCR
-
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
DTCR
-
SIL
Energy
DTCR
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
DTCR
-
SIL
-
Healthcare
DTCR
-
SIL
-
Industrials
DTCR
-
SIL
-
Utilities
DTCR
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTCR vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
DTCR
SIL
DTCR vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTCR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.30 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.61 | 2.79 | +3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.78 | 7.14 | +13.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTCR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90 | 1.83 | +2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.36 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.14 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
DTCR vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTCR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -82.99% | +44.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | -32.91% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.96% | -32.91% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.98% | -55.08% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -25.87% | +25.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -51.45% | +39.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 12.82% | -8.73% |
Volatility
DTCR vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is 7.16%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that DTCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTCR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 17.66% | -10.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 41.57% | -24.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 50.01% | -28.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 39.21% | -17.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 39.60% | -17.70% |
DTCR vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTCR vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than SIL's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTCR and SIL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to DTCR (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTCR dropped -38.98% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 5-year performance, DTCR leads with 15.53% vs 13.96% for SIL. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 15.53% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.
DTCR is categorized as REIT, while SIL is Silver. DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.65% for SIL.
DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTCR and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer