PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTCR vs. PWRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTCR vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 35.71% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 18.62% return.


DTCR

1D
0.49%
1M
-8.10%
6M
22.79%
YTD
35.71%
1Y
54.36%
3Y*
28.66%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*

PWRD

1D
1.11%
1M
0.18%
6M
13.02%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
30.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTCR vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
35.71%28.99%14.92%18.93%-21.56%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
18.62%32.84%28.54%20.83%-3.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DTCR and PWRD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022

0.64

The correlation between DTCR and PWRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTCR vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PWRD
PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTCR vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTCRPWRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

1.90

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.52

6.02

+5.50

DTCR vs. PWRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTCR Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the PWRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTCR and PWRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTCR vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and PWRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTCRPWRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-25.87%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-14.12%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-25.87%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.78%

-7.29%

-4.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-5.07%

-7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

4.45%

+0.28%

Volatility

DTCR vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is 8.13%, while TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that DTCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTCRPWRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

12.05%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.11%

22.43%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.88%

26.73%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.32%

23.21%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

23.21%

-1.04%

DTCR vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTCR vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison

DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than PWRD's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.87%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.05%0.22%0.49%0.78%0.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTCR and PWRD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWRD has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to DTCR (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTCR dropped -38.98% vs PWRD's -25.87%.

On 3-year performance, PWRD leads with 30.01% vs 28.66% for DTCR. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PWRD has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 28.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.05% for PWRD.

DTCR is categorized as REIT, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.75% for PWRD.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTCR and PWRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer