DTCR vs. PWRD
DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. DTCR is passively managed, while PWRD is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTCR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.
Performance
DTCR vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTCR achieves a 53.70% return, which is significantly higher than PWRD's 19.90% return.
DTCR
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 53.70%
- 6M
- 54.91%
- 1Y
- 82.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTCR vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 53.70% | 14.79% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 19.90% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTCR and PWRD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTCR vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
DTCR
PWRD
DTCR vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTCR | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTCR | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.32 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
DTCR vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTCR drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCR and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTCR | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -14.12% | -24.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -3.15% | -9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | — | — |
Volatility
DTCR vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTCR | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 23.98% | -2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 23.98% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 23.98% | -2.09% |
DTCR vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTCR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTCR vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.72% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTCR and PWRD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
DTCR is categorized as REIT, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTCR and 0.75% for PWRD.
Find the right allocation for DTCR and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer