DT vs. PDD
DT (Dynatrace, Inc.) and PDD (Pinduoduo Inc.) are both stocks. DT operates in Software - Application (Technology), while PDD operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, DT returned -5.97%/yr vs -7.73%/yr for PDD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DT vs. PDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DT achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly higher than PDD's -28.07% return.
DT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -11.49%
- 1Y
- -23.16%
- 3Y*
- -7.55%
- 5Y*
- -5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
PDD
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -28.07%
- 6M
- -27.15%
- 1Y
- -18.91%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DT vs. PDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DT Dynatrace, Inc. | -5.98% | -20.26% | -0.62% | 42.79% | -36.54% | 39.47% | 71.03% | -0.78% |
PDD Pinduoduo Inc. | -28.07% | 16.91% | -33.71% | 79.41% | 39.88% | -67.19% | 369.78% | 69.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DT and PDD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019 | 0.29 |
The correlation between DT and PDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DT:
$12.18B
PDD:
$120.71B
DT:
$0.73
PDD:
CN¥64.39
DT:
55.69
PDD:
8.58
DT:
0.77
PDD:
0.08
DT:
6.11
PDD:
1.86
DT:
4.66
PDD:
1.94
DT:
$2.02B
PDD:
CN¥441.76B
DT:
$1.65B
PDD:
CN¥247.30B
DT:
$289.14M
PDD:
CN¥134.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DT vs. PDD — Risk / Return Rank
DT
PDD
DT vs. PDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DT | PDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.91 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.52 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | -1.08 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DT vs. PDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DT drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum PDD drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DT and PDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DT | PDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.77% | -87.41% | +25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.87% | -41.14% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.16% | -48.40% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -80.88% | +19.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.26% | -59.79% | +11.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.74% | -39.32% | +8.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.41% | 19.55% | +4.86% |
Volatility
DT vs. PDD - Volatility Comparison
Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) have volatilities of 14.37% and 14.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DT | PDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.37% | 14.35% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 25.50% | +8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.53% | 32.48% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 68.09% | -27.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.56% | 69.37% | -22.81% |
Dividends
DT vs. PDD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DT nor PDD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DT vs. PDD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dynatrace, Inc. and Pinduoduo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DT vs. PDD - Profitability Comparison
DT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a gross profit of 430.32M and revenue of 531.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
PDD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.98B and revenue of 105.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.
DT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.34M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
PDD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported an operating income of 21.02B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.
DT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a net income of 76.21M and revenue of 531.72M, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.
PDD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a net income of 12.47B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DT and PDD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DT has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to PDD (14.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DT dropped -61.77% vs PDD's -87.41%.
DT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DT and PDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer