PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSY.PA vs. MUFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DSY.PA is traded in EUR, while MUFG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MUFG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSY.PA achieves a -26.84% return, which is significantly lower than MUFG's 29.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DSY.PA has underperformed MUFG with an annualized return of 4.34%, while MUFG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.


DSY.PA

1D
-5.44%
1M
-8.59%
YTD
-26.84%
6M
-25.81%
1Y
-45.66%
3Y*
-24.55%
5Y*
-14.23%
10Y*
4.34%

MUFG

1D
0.48%
1M
9.70%
YTD
29.07%
6M
27.78%
1Y
49.20%
3Y*
42.90%
5Y*
34.37%
10Y*
18.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSY.PA
Dassault Systèmes SE
-26.84%-28.28%-23.83%32.78%-35.69%59.82%16.14%44.84%20.04%26.45%
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
29.07%23.35%49.34%29.49%35.27%35.10%-22.92%14.02%-29.87%6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DSY.PA and MUFG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.16

The correlation between DSY.PA and MUFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSY.PA vs. MUFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSY.PA
DSY.PA Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DSY.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSY.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSY.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DSY.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSY.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MUFG
MUFG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MUFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MUFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA) and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSY.PAMUFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.33

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

3.38

-4.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

9.24

-10.78

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSY.PA Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the MUFG Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSY.PA and MUFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSY.PA drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than MUFG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSY.PA and MUFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSY.PAMUFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.94%

-59.85%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.59%

-14.64%

-35.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.60%

-27.48%

-39.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.94%

-27.48%

-43.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.94%

-52.68%

-18.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.24%

0.00%

-68.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.04%

-26.07%

+12.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.61%

5.34%

+24.27%

Volatility

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Volatility Comparison

Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) at 5.86%. This indicates that DSY.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSY.PAMUFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.84%

5.86%

+9.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.30%

18.01%

+17.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

24.78%

+14.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.59%

28.60%

+1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.49%

27.84%

+0.65%

Dividends

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Dividend Comparison

DSY.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than MUFG's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSY.PA
Dassault Systèmes SE
1.57%1.09%0.69%0.47%0.51%1.07%2.11%2.22%2.80%2.99%3.25%2.92%
MUFG
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.12%3.12%2.50%2.90%3.36%2.18%2.62%0.00%0.00%2.20%2.70%2.34%

Financials

DSY.PA vs. MUFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dassault Systèmes SE and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. DSY.PA values in EUR, MUFG values in JPY

Frequently Asked Questions


DSY.PA and MUFG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSY.PA and MUFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer