PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSVSF vs. AUCO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Discovery Silver Corp (DSVSF) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DSVSF having a -8.44% return and AUCO.L slightly lower at -8.56%.


DSVSF

1D
3.11%
1M
-21.07%
YTD
-8.44%
6M
-1.31%
1Y
126.56%
3Y*
105.48%
5Y*
22.30%
10Y*

AUCO.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
-16.15%
YTD
-8.56%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
46.28%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DSVSF
Discovery Silver Corp
-8.44%1,173.33%-16.38%-42.60%-39.39%7.84%194.37%148.77%-23.47%
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-8.56%181.83%17.96%15.02%-14.30%-10.12%21.72%44.14%9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DSVSF and AUCO.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2018

0.43

The correlation between DSVSF and AUCO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSVSF
DSVSF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DSVSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSVSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSVSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DSVSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSVSF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AUCO.L
AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Discovery Silver Corp (DSVSF) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSVSFAUCO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.70

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

4.45

+3.94

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSVSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSVSF and AUCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSVSFAUCO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.18

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.54

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.20

+0.43

Drawdowns

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSVSF drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AUCO.L drawdown of -78.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSVSF and AUCO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSVSFAUCO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-78.30%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.74%

-31.80%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.55%

-31.80%

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.65%

-48.62%

-33.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.60%

-31.80%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.67%

-40.79%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.14%

12.15%

+2.99%

Volatility

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison

Discovery Silver Corp (DSVSF) has a higher volatility of 23.77% compared to L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) at 15.14%. This indicates that DSVSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSVSFAUCO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.77%

15.14%

+8.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.60%

36.64%

+20.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.78%

45.89%

+31.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.16%

38.20%

+37.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.80%

35.40%

+50.40%

Dividends

DSVSF vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DSVSF nor AUCO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DSVSF and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSVSF and AUCO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer