PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSTL vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSTL vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 12.83% return.


DSTL

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.26%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.90%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*

NULV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.62%
YTD
12.83%
6M
13.15%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSTL vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DSTL
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
2.53%8.71%12.78%22.71%-10.64%28.87%19.31%35.49%-6.66%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
12.83%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%27.26%-3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DSTL and NULV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018

0.90

The correlation between DSTL and NULV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSTL vs. NULV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSTL
NULV

Technology

26.7%
20.1%

Healthcare

20.3%
11.6%

Industrials

15.9%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
4.0%

Communication Services

7.6%
13.7%

Financial Services

6.9%
18.8%

Energy

5.6%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
9.2%

Utilities

1.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Technology

DSTL
26.7%
NULV
20.1%

Healthcare

DSTL
20.3%
NULV
11.6%

Industrials

DSTL
15.9%
NULV
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DSTL
11.6%
NULV
4.0%

Communication Services

DSTL
7.6%
NULV
13.7%

Financial Services

DSTL
6.9%
NULV
18.8%

Energy

DSTL
5.6%
NULV
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

DSTL
3.5%
NULV
9.2%

Utilities

DSTL
1.0%
NULV
3.6%

Basic Materials

DSTL
0.7%
NULV
2.3%

Real Estate

DSTL

-

NULV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSTL vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSTL
DSTL Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DSTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSTL Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DSTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSTL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSTL vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSTLNULVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.69

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

15.52

-10.89

DSTL vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSTL and NULV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSTLNULVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

2.52

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.60

+0.12

Drawdowns

DSTL vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and NULV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSTLNULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-36.99%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-7.28%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-15.07%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-21.47%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-0.70%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.98%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.73%

+1.02%

Volatility

DSTL vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) at 2.55%. This indicates that DSTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSTLNULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.55%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

7.94%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

10.67%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

14.33%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

17.02%

+2.37%

DSTL vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSTL vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than NULV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSTL
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
1.24%1.31%1.34%1.30%1.35%1.01%0.83%0.97%0.00%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.45%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSTL and NULV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSTL has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to NULV (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs NULV's -36.99%.

On 5-year performance, DSTL leads with 9.04% vs 8.48% for NULV. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DSTL has performed better with a 9.04% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DSTL.

NULV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.24% for DSTL.

They also come from different issuers: Distillate Capital and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.26% for NULV.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSTL and NULV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer