DSTL vs. IWX
DSTL (Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DSTL is actively managed, while IWX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSTL returned 10.39%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for IWX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DSTL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWX.
Performance
DSTL vs. IWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly lower than IWX's 20.90% return.
DSTL
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.47%
IWX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- YTD
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.23M | $3.71M | $4.59M | |
| $55.11M | $49.72M | $33.93M |
DSTL vs. IWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 11.38% | 8.71% | 12.78% | 22.71% | -10.64% | 28.87% | 19.31% | 35.49% | -8.42% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 20.90% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSTL and IWX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DSTL and IWX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DSTL vs. IWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSTL
IWX
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
DSTL
IWX
Healthcare
DSTL
IWX
Industrials
DSTL
IWX
Consumer Cyclical
DSTL
IWX
Financial Services
DSTL
IWX
Communication Services
DSTL
IWX
Energy
DSTL
IWX
Consumer Defensive
DSTL
IWX
Utilities
DSTL
IWX
Basic Materials
DSTL
IWX
Real Estate
DSTL
-
IWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSTL vs. IWX — Risk / Return Rank
DSTL
IWX
DSTL vs. IWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSTL | IWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.55 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 5.05 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 22.22 | -15.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSTL vs. IWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum IWX drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and IWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSTL | IWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.09% | -35.76% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -6.59% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -13.37% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | -18.13% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | 0.00% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -3.79% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 1.50% | +1.38% |
Volatility
DSTL vs. IWX - Volatility Comparison
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) at 3.10%. This indicates that DSTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSTL | IWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 3.10% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 8.46% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 10.81% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 13.89% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 16.48% | +2.91% |
DSTL vs. IWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSTL vs. IWX - Dividend Comparison
DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than IWX's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.35% | 1.01% | 0.83% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSTL and IWX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSTL has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to IWX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs IWX's -35.76%.
On 5-year performance, IWX leads with 12.65% vs 10.39% for DSTL. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWX has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DSTL.
IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.13% for DSTL.
They also come from different issuers: Distillate and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.20% for IWX.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSTL and IWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer