DSTL vs. FCFY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DSTL (Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF) and FCFY (First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DSTL is actively managed, while FCFY is passively managed. Over the past year, DSTL returned 21.28% vs 16.48% for FCFY. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DSTL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FCFY.

Performance

DSTL vs. FCFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSTL achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than FCFY's 4.23% return.

DSTL

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 5.06%
• 6M: 9.47%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 1Y: 21.28%
• 3Y*: 13.05%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.47%

FCFY

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 3.79%
• 6M: 6.14%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 1Y: 16.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF	$4.23M	$3.71M	$4.59M
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF	$12.76K	$10.28K	$5.35K

DSTL vs. FCFY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF	11.38%	8.71%	12.78%	8.45%
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF	4.23%	16.76%	11.28%	11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DSTL and FCFY is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2023	0.90

The correlation between DSTL and FCFY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSTL vs. FCFY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DSTL	FCFY
Technology	28.6%	35.8%
Healthcare	22.6%	11.4%
Industrials	13.4%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	10.7%
Financial Services	7.5%	12.2%
Communication Services	6.0%	9.1%
Energy	5.3%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	4.7%
Utilities	1.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.6%
Real Estate	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

DSTL vs. FCFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSTL

DSTL Risk / Return Rank: 68
DSTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
DSTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DSTL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DSTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DSTL Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FCFY

FCFY Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FCFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FCFY Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FCFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FCFY Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSTL vs. FCFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) and First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DSTL	FCFY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	0.90	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	1.38	+0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.17	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	1.24	+1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.12	3.10	+4.02

DSTL vs. FCFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the FCFY Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSTL and FCFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DSTL vs. FCFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSTL drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, which is greater than FCFY's maximum drawdown of -21.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSTL and FCFY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSTL	FCFY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.09%	-21.36%	-11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-11.94%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.50%	-2.28%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-3.54%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	4.77%	-1.89%

Volatility

DSTL vs. FCFY - Volatility Comparison

Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) at 5.47%. This indicates that DSTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSTL	FCFY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	5.47%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	12.07%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.36%	16.60%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	17.52%	-1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.39%	17.52%	+1.87%

DSTL vs. FCFY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSTL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFY's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSTL vs. FCFY - Dividend Comparison

DSTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than FCFY's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DSTL Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF	1.13%	1.31%	1.34%	1.30%	1.35%	1.01%	0.83%	0.97%
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF	1.41%	1.48%	1.76%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSTL and FCFY in my portfolio?

DSTL and FCFY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSTL or FCFY?

DSTL has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to FCFY (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSTL dropped -33.09% vs FCFY's -21.36%.

Which ETF is better, DSTL or FCFY?

On 1-year performance, DSTL leads with 21.28% vs 16.48% for FCFY. On fees, DSTL is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FCFY has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSTL or FCFY?

Over the 1-year period, DSTL has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 16.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSTL or FCFY?

DSTL is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCFY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSTL or FCFY?

FCFY has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.13% for DSTL.

What is the main difference between DSTL and FCFY?

They also come from different issuers: Distillate and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DSTL and 0.60% for FCFY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.