PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSMDX vs. BQMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSMDX achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than BQMGX's -3.06% return.


DSMDX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.21%
YTD
19.85%
6M
16.25%
1Y
40.81%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*

BQMGX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
-2.98%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DSMDX
Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
19.85%9.83%26.45%20.71%-31.46%17.96%74.27%
BQMGX
Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund
-3.06%-0.29%14.16%13.00%-19.44%23.02%37.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DSMDX and BQMGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between DSMDX and BQMGX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSMDX vs. BQMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSMDX
DSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BQMGX
BQMGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BQMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BQMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BQMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BQMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BQMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSMDXBQMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.97

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

-0.28

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.04

-0.66

+11.69

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the BQMGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSMDX and BQMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSMDXBQMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

-0.27

+1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.17

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.50

+0.22

Drawdowns

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSMDX drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than BQMGX's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMDX and BQMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSMDXBQMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.90%

-36.05%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

-11.62%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.05%

-18.72%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.90%

-25.92%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-8.96%

+8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-5.87%

-9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

4.90%

-1.12%

Volatility

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (DSMDX) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) at 3.38%. This indicates that DSMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BQMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSMDXBQMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

3.38%

+5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.78%

9.13%

+10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.62%

12.19%

+12.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.77%

16.83%

+8.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.98%

17.98%

+8.00%

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BQMGX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSMDX vs. BQMGX - Dividend Comparison

DSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than BQMGX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BQMGX
Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.25%4.12%5.99%0.00%5.90%8.05%5.27%3.50%0.00%0.08%1.07%5.80%
DSMDX
Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.34%0.41%0.33%0.00%3.72%7.93%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSMDX and BQMGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSMDX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to BQMGX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSMDX dropped -41.90% vs BQMGX's -36.05%.

DSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSMDX and BQMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer