DSL vs. PIAMX
DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) and PIAMX (PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, DSL returned 0.94%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for PIAMX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DSL charges 2.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for PIAMX.
Performance
DSL vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSL achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than PIAMX's 0.79% return.
DSL
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- -0.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
PIAMX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
DSL vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 1.47% | -0.01% | 15.00% | 23.41% | -22.61% | 7.39% | -6.49% | 25.10% | -6.67% |
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund | 0.79% | 2.34% | 11.23% | 16.38% | -10.93% | 7.82% | 9.05% | 11.77% | -2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSL and PIAMX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSL vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank
DSL
PIAMX
DSL vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSL | PIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.27 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 1.12 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 3.37 | -3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSL | PIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 1.35 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 1.03 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.22 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
DSL vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSL drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSL and PIAMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSL | PIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.51% | -18.15% | -31.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -3.75% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -6.17% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.18% | -13.92% | -20.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -0.55% | -5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -2.34% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 1.25% | +4.29% |
Volatility
DSL vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) at 0.73%. This indicates that DSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSL | PIAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 0.73% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 2.44% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 3.12% | +6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 4.04% | +10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 4.23% | +15.87% |
DSL vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSL has a 2.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSL vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison
DSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.12%, more than PIAMX's 7.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 12.12% | 11.71% | 11.38% | 10.78% | 13.67% | 10.74% | 10.69% | 9.33% | 10.39% | 9.11% | 9.53% | 11.63% |
PIAMX PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund | 7.90% | 9.12% | 8.49% | 8.12% | 7.99% | 8.64% | 6.63% | 6.96% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSL and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSL has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to PIAMX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSL dropped -49.51% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.
PIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSL and PIAMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer