DSL vs. CRDOX
DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) and CRDOX (Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, DSL returned 0.97%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for CRDOX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DSL charges 2.28%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CRDOX.
Performance
DSL vs. CRDOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSL achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than CRDOX's 1.92% return.
DSL
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- -0.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
CRDOX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 7.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
DSL vs. CRDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 1.66% | -0.01% | 15.00% | 23.41% | -22.61% | 7.39% | -0.69% |
CRDOX Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund | 1.92% | 7.48% | 8.69% | 8.06% | -10.62% | 2.66% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSL and CRDOX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSL vs. CRDOX — Risk / Return Rank
DSL
CRDOX
DSL vs. CRDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) and Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSL | CRDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.71 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 3.03 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 13.45 | -13.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSL | CRDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 2.90 | -2.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.78 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.85 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
DSL vs. CRDOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSL drawdown since its inception was -49.51%, which is greater than CRDOX's maximum drawdown of -15.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSL and CRDOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSL | CRDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.51% | -15.92% | -33.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -2.70% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -4.66% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.18% | -15.92% | -18.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.12% | -0.11% | -6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -3.53% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.56% | 0.61% | +4.95% |
Volatility
DSL vs. CRDOX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund (CRDOX) at 0.88%. This indicates that DSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSL | CRDOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 0.88% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 2.28% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.27% | 2.83% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 4.15% | +10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 4.02% | +16.07% |
DSL vs. CRDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSL has a 2.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDOX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSL vs. CRDOX - Dividend Comparison
DSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.10%, more than CRDOX's 6.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDOX Six Circles Credit Opportunities Fund | 6.62% | 5.18% | 6.96% | 6.86% | 5.82% | 2.73% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 12.10% | 11.71% | 11.38% | 10.78% | 13.67% | 10.74% | 10.69% | 9.33% | 10.39% | 9.11% | 9.53% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSL and CRDOX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSL has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to CRDOX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSL dropped -49.51% vs CRDOX's -15.92%.
CRDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSL and CRDOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer