PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DSI vs. XCH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DSI vs. XCH.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) and XCH.TO (iShares China Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while XCH.TO is a China Equities fund tracking the Morningstar China GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DSI returned 15.40%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for XCH.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for XCH.TO.

Performance

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DSI is traded in USD, while XCH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XCH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than XCH.TO's -8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DSI has outperformed XCH.TO with an annualized return of 15.40%, while XCH.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.

DSI

1D
0.83%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
9.87%
6M
10.52%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
15.40%

XCH.TO

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-8.08%
6M
-8.73%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
-3.55%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF		9.87%18.03%22.38%28.51%-21.71%31.32%20.94%31.15%-3.90%20.89%
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF		-8.08%28.33%28.61%-12.68%-20.44%-20.52%9.78%12.76%-13.55%36.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and XCH.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2010

0.42

The correlation between DSI and XCH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (5 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DSI
XCH.TO

Technology

43.1%
9.0%

Communication Services

12.8%
12.5%

Financial Services

10.1%
34.5%

Industrials

8.0%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
25.6%

Healthcare

7.0%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
0.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.8%

Energy

1.5%
5.2%

Utilities

0.9%
0.4%

Technology

DSI
43.1%
XCH.TO
9.0%

Communication Services

DSI
12.8%
XCH.TO
12.5%

Financial Services

DSI
10.1%
XCH.TO
34.5%

Industrials

DSI
8.0%
XCH.TO
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DSI
8.0%
XCH.TO
25.6%

Healthcare

DSI
7.0%
XCH.TO
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

DSI
4.0%
XCH.TO
0.8%

Real Estate

DSI
2.6%
XCH.TO
1.1%

Basic Materials

DSI
2.2%
XCH.TO
3.8%

Energy

DSI
1.5%
XCH.TO
5.2%

Utilities

DSI
0.9%
XCH.TO
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF

iShares China Index ETF

Often compared with DSI:
DSI vs. SPYDSI vs. VOODSI vs. FSLEXDSI vs. XSUS.TODSI vs. VTIDSI vs. QQQDSI vs. SPYG
Often compared with XCH.TO:
XCH.TO vs. VEE.TOXCH.TO vs. XEC.TOXCH.TO vs. XAW.TOXCH.TO vs. ZCH.TOXCH.TO vs. VFV.TOXCH.TO vs. XIC.TOXCH.TO vs. FBRT

Return for Risk

DSI vs. XCH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
XCH.TO
XCH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DSIXCH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.88
-0.15

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.56
-0.07

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.99

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

-0.18

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

-0.38

+9.93

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the XCH.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and XCH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, smaller than the maximum XCH.TO drawdown of -60.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and XCH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DSIXCH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-60.79%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-16.21%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-28.26%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-55.12%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

-60.79%

+26.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-28.78%

+26.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-23.83%

+16.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

7.83%

-5.16%

Volatility

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) is 5.22%, while iShares China Index ETF (XCH.TO) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that DSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DSIXCH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

5.88%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

13.74%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

19.87%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

30.39%

-12.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

26.37%

-7.63%

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XCH.TO's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSI vs. XCH.TO - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than XCH.TO's 2.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF		0.86%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
XCH.TO
iShares China Index ETF		2.25%2.11%1.54%2.86%2.35%1.51%2.17%2.50%2.45%2.41%2.21%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

DSI and XCH.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for XCH.TO.

DSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XCH.TO is China Equities. DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while XCH.TO tracks Morningstar China GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.87% for XCH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and XCH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer