PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSI vs. PABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSI vs. PABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 11.83% return, which is significantly higher than PABU's 6.81% return.


DSI

1D
1.78%
1M
2.10%
YTD
11.83%
6M
12.35%
1Y
29.36%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
15.60%

PABU

1D
1.98%
1M
1.91%
YTD
6.81%
6M
7.83%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. PABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
11.83%18.03%22.38%28.51%-16.01%
PABU
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
6.81%13.08%24.84%29.51%-15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and PABU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.93

The correlation between DSI and PABU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DSI vs. PABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DSI
PABU

Technology

43.1%
52.1%

Communication Services

12.8%
8.4%

Financial Services

10.1%
6.8%

Industrials

8.0%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
6.0%

Healthcare

7.0%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Real Estate

2.6%
16.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.5%

Energy

1.5%
0.9%

Utilities

0.9%
1.6%

Technology

DSI
43.1%
PABU
52.1%

Communication Services

DSI
12.8%
PABU
8.4%

Financial Services

DSI
10.1%
PABU
6.8%

Industrials

DSI
8.0%
PABU
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DSI
8.0%
PABU
6.0%

Healthcare

DSI
7.0%
PABU
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

DSI
4.0%
PABU

-

Real Estate

DSI
2.6%
PABU
16.6%

Basic Materials

DSI
2.2%
PABU
0.5%

Energy

DSI
1.5%
PABU
0.9%

Utilities

DSI
0.9%
PABU
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSI vs. PABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI
DSI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PABU
PABU Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PABU Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PABU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. PABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSIPABUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.57

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

5.37

+5.68

DSI vs. PABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the PABU Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and PABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSI vs. PABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than PABU's maximum drawdown of -22.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and PABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSIPABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.23%

-22.76%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-13.40%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-20.85%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-3.61%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-5.62%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.91%

-1.25%

Volatility

DSI vs. PABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) is 5.40%, while iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that DSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSIPABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

5.97%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

11.32%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

14.06%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.76%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

18.76%

0.00%

DSI vs. PABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PABU's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DSI vs. PABU - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than PABU's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
1.04%0.92%1.03%1.19%1.39%0.99%1.22%1.40%1.63%1.28%1.51%1.46%
PABU
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
1.09%0.90%1.00%1.06%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DSI and PABU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PABU has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to DSI (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs PABU's -22.76%.

On 3-year performance, DSI leads with 20.81% vs 18.02% for PABU. On fees, PABU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DSI has performed better with a 20.81% return vs 18.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PABU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DSI.

PABU has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 1.04% for DSI.

DSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PABU is Large Cap Blend Equities. DSI tracks MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, while PABU tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 0.10% for PABU.

DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSI and PABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer