PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSEEX vs. DBLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE (DSEEX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSEEX achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DSEEX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.61% annualized return.


DSEEX

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.19%
6M
-0.45%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
12.36%

DBLTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.80%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
1.61%
ALL TIME*
3.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSEEX
DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE
1.86%9.49%12.84%27.03%-23.24%24.91%16.27%37.28%-3.99%21.61%
DBLTX
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I
-0.46%8.05%3.08%5.34%-12.56%0.24%4.13%5.81%1.76%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DSEEX and DBLTX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.00

Over the past year, DSEEX and DBLTX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSEEX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DSEEX
DSEEX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DSEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DSEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLTX
DBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE (DSEEX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DSEEXDBLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.14

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

0.97

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

2.33

-1.21

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSEEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the DBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSEEX and DBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSEEX drawdown since its inception was -41.66%, which is greater than DBLTX's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSEEX and DBLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSEEXDBLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.66%

-16.49%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-3.17%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

-5.33%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.66%

-16.49%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.66%

-16.49%

-25.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-2.46%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-2.37%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

1.31%

+1.90%

Volatility

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE (DSEEX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) at 1.09%. This indicates that DSEEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSEEXDBLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

1.09%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

3.01%

+6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

3.82%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

5.62%

+17.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

4.42%

+17.32%

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSEEX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSEEX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison

DSEEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than DBLTX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLTX
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I
4.95%4.86%5.03%4.35%3.86%3.12%3.39%3.66%3.74%3.65%3.72%4.11%
DSEEX
DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE
4.88%4.93%4.92%4.59%16.41%28.54%1.73%7.57%15.27%9.09%4.09%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSEEX and DBLTX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSEEX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to DBLTX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSEEX dropped -41.66% vs DBLTX's -16.49%.

DBLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSEEX and DBLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer