DSCO vs. SMBS
DSCO (DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF) and SMBS (Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. DSCO is actively managed, while SMBS is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DSCO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SMBS.
Performance
DSCO vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DSCO
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMBS
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 5.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DSCO vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DSCO DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF | 1.17% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSCO and SMBS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSCO vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank
DSCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMBS
DSCO vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF (DSCO) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DSCO | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DSCO vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSCO drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, smaller than the maximum SMBS drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCO and SMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSCO | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -3.20% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -1.32% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -0.85% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
DSCO vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSCO | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44% | 4.13% | -1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 4.85% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 4.85% | -2.41% |
DSCO vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSCO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSCO vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison
DSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than SMBS's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DSCO DoubleLine Securitized Credit ETF | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSCO and SMBS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DSCO.
SMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 2.26% for DSCO.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DSCO and 0.03% for SMBS.
Find the right allocation for DSCO and SMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer