DSCIX vs. CMCIX
DSCIX (Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, DSCIX returned 46.53% vs 0.07% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DSCIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSCIX achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.
DSCIX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 6M
- 21.28%
- 1Y
- 46.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
CMCIX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DSCIX Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund | 20.85% | 13.18% | 5.10% | 11.22% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 1.72% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSCIX and CMCIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DSCIX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSCIX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
DSCIX
CMCIX
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSCIX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.75 | -0.02 | +2.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 0.08 | +3.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.01 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | -0.04 | +6.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.55 | -0.09 | +23.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSCIX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | -0.02 | +2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSCIX drawdown since its inception was -47.60%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCIX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSCIX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.60% | -21.50% | -26.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -11.68% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.79% | +10.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -6.44% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 4.98% | -3.01% |
Volatility
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund (DSCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that DSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSCIX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 3.89% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 10.55% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 15.16% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 16.55% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 16.55% | +6.70% |
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSCIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSCIX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
DSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than CMCIX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.18% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSCIX Dana Epiphany ESG Small Cap Equity Fund | 4.97% | 6.01% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 4.99% | 8.71% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 9.11% | 0.03% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSCIX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSCIX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSCIX dropped -47.60% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
DSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSCIX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer