PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSCGX vs. DFSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSCGX achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly lower than DFSTX's 14.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DSCGX having a 10.53% annualized return and DFSTX not far ahead at 10.93%.


DSCGX

1D
0.27%
1M
2.65%
YTD
9.38%
6M
8.48%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
10.53%

DFSTX

1D
0.76%
1M
3.51%
YTD
14.69%
6M
13.91%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSCGX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio
9.38%5.94%13.86%21.25%-17.79%20.37%19.35%26.17%-12.33%15.99%
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
14.69%8.07%11.50%17.66%-13.50%30.50%11.19%21.78%-13.20%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DSCGX and DFSTX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.98

The correlation between DSCGX and DFSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSCGX vs. DFSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSCGX
DSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
DSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSTX
DFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSCGXDFSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.87

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.73

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.42

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.30

11.58

-5.28

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the DFSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSCGX and DFSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSCGXDFSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.87

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.40

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.50

+0.04

Drawdowns

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCGX drawdown since its inception was -41.44%, smaller than the maximum DFSTX drawdown of -60.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCGX and DFSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSCGXDFSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.44%

-60.99%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-9.16%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-25.91%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

-25.91%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.44%

-44.78%

+3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-8.77%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.69%

+0.44%

Volatility

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) is 4.20%, while DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio (DFSTX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that DSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSCGXDFSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

4.45%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

11.57%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

16.76%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

20.56%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

22.08%

-0.30%

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCGX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSTX's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSCGX vs. DFSTX - Dividend Comparison

DSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DFSTX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSTX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Portfolio
0.95%1.08%1.05%2.45%5.18%6.39%1.08%3.30%5.16%4.56%3.10%5.90%
DSCGX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.54%0.60%0.62%0.72%4.08%3.27%0.58%1.28%5.44%1.50%1.12%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, DSCGX and DFSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFSTX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DSCGX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSCGX dropped -41.44% vs DFSTX's -60.99%.

DFSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSCGX and DFSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer