PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DSCGX vs. NBGNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DSCGX and NBGNX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.81%
-0.83%
DSCGX
NBGNX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DSCGX:

0.82

NBGNX:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

DSCGX:

1.26

NBGNX:

0.67

Omega Ratio

DSCGX:

1.15

NBGNX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

DSCGX:

1.10

NBGNX:

0.35

Martin Ratio

DSCGX:

3.66

NBGNX:

1.18

Ulcer Index

DSCGX:

3.83%

NBGNX:

5.58%

Daily Std Dev

DSCGX:

17.07%

NBGNX:

17.35%

Max Drawdown

DSCGX:

-43.10%

NBGNX:

-51.48%

Current Drawdown

DSCGX:

-5.21%

NBGNX:

-11.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSCGX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, DSCGX has outperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 7.79%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.


DSCGX

YTD

3.34%

1M

-0.54%

6M

6.81%

1Y

15.74%

5Y*

9.31%

10Y*

7.79%

NBGNX

YTD

0.86%

1M

-1.38%

6M

-0.83%

1Y

8.57%

5Y*

4.89%

10Y*

1.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCGX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.


NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
Expense ratio chart for NBGNX: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for DSCGX: current value at 0.32% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.32%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DSCGX vs. NBGNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSCGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DSCGX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBGNX is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DSCGX, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.820.38
The chart of Sortino ratio for DSCGX, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.260.67
The chart of Omega ratio for DSCGX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.151.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for DSCGX, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.100.35
The chart of Martin ratio for DSCGX, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.661.18
DSCGX
NBGNX

The current DSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSCGX and NBGNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.82
0.38
DSCGX
NBGNX

Dividends

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

DSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while NBGNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DSCGX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.60%0.62%0.72%0.83%0.56%0.58%0.74%0.99%0.72%0.84%0.78%0.63%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
0.00%0.00%3.07%11.05%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%0.20%0.47%0.52%0.38%

Drawdowns

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCGX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, smaller than the maximum NBGNX drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCGX and NBGNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-5.21%
-11.64%
DSCGX
NBGNX

Volatility

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.14%
4.08%
DSCGX
NBGNX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab