PortfoliosLab logo
DSCGX vs. NBGNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DSCGX and NBGNX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DSCGX:

0.06

NBGNX:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

DSCGX:

0.30

NBGNX:

-0.01

Omega Ratio

DSCGX:

1.04

NBGNX:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

DSCGX:

0.09

NBGNX:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

DSCGX:

0.27

NBGNX:

-0.25

Ulcer Index

DSCGX:

7.99%

NBGNX:

9.99%

Daily Std Dev

DSCGX:

22.63%

NBGNX:

21.96%

Max Drawdown

DSCGX:

-43.10%

NBGNX:

-51.48%

Current Drawdown

DSCGX:

-12.77%

NBGNX:

-16.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSCGX achieves a -4.90% return, which is significantly higher than NBGNX's -6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, DSCGX has underperformed NBGNX with an annualized return of 6.88%, while NBGNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.


DSCGX

YTD

-4.90%

1M

5.57%

6M

-11.21%

1Y

1.29%

5Y*

12.48%

10Y*

6.88%

NBGNX

YTD

-6.63%

1M

5.77%

6M

-14.63%

1Y

-3.21%

5Y*

9.38%

10Y*

8.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCGX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DSCGX vs. NBGNX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSCGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DSCGX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DSCGX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGNX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBGNX is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBGNX is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the NBGNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSCGX and NBGNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

DSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while NBGNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DSCGX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio
0.68%0.62%0.72%0.83%0.56%0.58%0.74%0.99%0.72%0.84%0.78%0.63%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
0.00%0.00%3.07%11.05%0.00%0.00%0.05%0.05%0.20%0.47%0.52%0.38%

Drawdowns

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCGX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, smaller than the maximum NBGNX drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCGX and NBGNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DSCGX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...