DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

DS2P.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and LDAP.L (L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - DS2P.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while LDAP.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DS2P.L returned -20.16%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for LDAP.L. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. DS2P.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LDAP.L.

Performance

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DS2P.L is traded in GBp, while LDAP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDAP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DS2P.L achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly lower than LDAP.L's 16.41% return.

DS2P.L

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -1.79%
• 6M: -1.11%
• YTD: -11.00%
• 1Y: -7.47%
• 3Y*: -24.32%
• 5Y*: -20.16%
• 10Y*: -23.39%

LDAP.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -2.82%
• 6M: 13.36%
• YTD: 16.41%
• 1Y: 23.45%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DS2P.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-11.00%	-29.68%	-28.35%	-29.73%	13.75%	-15.76%
LDAP.L L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	16.41%	25.93%	5.62%	3.68%	1.90%	-98.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DS2P.L and LDAP.L is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021	-0.46

Return for Risk

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DS2P.L

DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 8
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

LDAP.L

LDAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
LDAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LDAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LDAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LDAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
LDAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DS2P.L	LDAP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.57	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	2.20	-2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.28	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	2.43	-2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	6.19	-6.77

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the LDAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DS2P.L and LDAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DS2P.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, roughly equal to the maximum LDAP.L drawdown of -99.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DS2P.L and LDAP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DS2P.L	LDAP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.62%	-99.19%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.26%	-9.62%	-17.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.63%	-20.15%	-47.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.85%	-26.81%	-52.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.59%	-98.35%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.22%	-98.64%	+9.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	3.78%	+9.04%

Volatility

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDAP.L) at 5.20%. This indicates that DS2P.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DS2P.L	LDAP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.45%	5.20%	+4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.11%	12.51%	+15.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.11%	14.86%	+19.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.73%	26.52%	+10.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.73%	50.33%	-11.60%

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DS2P.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LDAP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

DS2P.L vs. LDAP.L - Dividend Comparison

DS2P.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DS2P.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LDAP.L L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	3.86%	4.23%	4.86%	5.25%	4.92%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DS2P.L and LDAP.L in my portfolio?

DS2P.L and LDAP.L have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DS2P.L or LDAP.L?

On fees, LDAP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DS2P.L or LDAP.L?

LDAP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DS2P.L.

What is the main difference between DS2P.L and LDAP.L?

DS2P.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LDAP.L is Asia Pacific Equities. DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR, while LDAP.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Net Tax Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DS2P.L and 0.40% for LDAP.L.