LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L
LDAP.L (L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis) and IDFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - LDAP.L tracks the L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis while IDFF.L tracks the iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDAP.L returned 9.64%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for IDFF.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDAP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDFF.L.
Performance
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDAP.L achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly lower than IDFF.L's 26.95% return.
LDAP.L
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
IDFF.L
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 48.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDAP.L L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 17.12% | 35.59% | 3.81% | 9.13% | -8.93% | -99.00% |
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 26.95% | 39.49% | 12.16% | 1.47% | -21.79% | -11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDAP.L and IDFF.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between LDAP.L and IDFF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDAP.L
IDFF.L
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDAP.L) and iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDAP.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.79 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 11.11 | -4.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDAP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than IDFF.L's maximum drawdown of -64.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDAP.L and IDFF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDAP.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.33% | -64.08% | -35.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -12.63% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.47% | -19.77% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.61% | -43.71% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.38% | -10.89% | -87.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -98.71% | -18.18% | -80.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 4.32% | -0.28% |
Volatility
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDAP.L) is 4.91%, while iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IDFF.L) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that LDAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDFF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDAP.L | IDFF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 10.68% | -5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 22.07% | -8.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 24.77% | -8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.07% | 22.32% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.15% | 20.81% | +30.34% |
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDAP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IDFF.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDAP.L vs. IDFF.L - Dividend Comparison
LDAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than IDFF.L's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.10% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.39% | 1.13% | 1.67% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 2.29% |
LDAP.L L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 3.83% | 4.23% | 4.86% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDAP.L and IDFF.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDAP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDAP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDFF.L.
LDAP.L tracks L&G APAC ex-Japan Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis, while IDFF.L tracks iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LDAP.L and 0.74% for IDFF.L.
Find the right allocation for LDAP.L and IDFF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer