DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L
DS2P.L (L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and 3VT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DS2P.L is passively managed, while 3VT.L is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. DS2P.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3VT.L.
Performance
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DS2P.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -11.00%
- 1Y
- -7.47%
- 3Y*
- -24.32%
- 5Y*
- -20.16%
- 10Y*
- -23.39%
3VT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DS2P.L L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -16.16% |
3VT.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP | 30.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DS2P.L and 3VT.L is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2026 | -0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L — Risk / Return Rank
DS2P.L
3VT.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Total World ETP Securities GBP (3VT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DS2P.L | 3VT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DS2P.L drawdown since its inception was -99.62%, which is greater than 3VT.L's maximum drawdown of -11.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DS2P.L and 3VT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DS2P.L | 3VT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.62% | -11.41% | -88.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.59% | -6.62% | -92.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.22% | -3.34% | -85.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.82% | — | — |
Volatility
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DS2P.L | 3VT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.11% | 41.59% | -7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 41.59% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.73% | 41.59% | -2.86% |
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DS2P.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than 3VT.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DS2P.L vs. 3VT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DS2P.L nor 3VT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DS2P.L and 3VT.L have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DS2P.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DS2P.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3VT.L.
They also come from different issuers: L&G and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DS2P.L and 0.75% for 3VT.L.
Find the right allocation for DS2P.L and 3VT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer