PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVG.L achieves a 42.32% return, which is significantly higher than EBUY.L's 20.16% return.


DRVG.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
13.93%
YTD
42.32%
6M
42.97%
1Y
94.73%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
10Y*

EBUY.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
14.22%
YTD
20.16%
6M
18.88%
1Y
36.29%
3Y*
23.16%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DRVG.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing
42.32%20.43%-4.12%19.60%-26.53%-3.79%
EBUY.L
Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc
20.16%9.88%27.49%29.53%-31.73%-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DRVG.L and EBUY.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.75

The correlation between DRVG.L and EBUY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRVG.L
EBUY.L

Technology

37.7%
63.6%

Consumer Cyclical

25.2%
10.7%

Industrials

18.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

13.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.7%
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

7.9%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

DRVG.L
37.7%
EBUY.L
63.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DRVG.L
25.2%
EBUY.L
10.7%

Industrials

DRVG.L
18.0%
EBUY.L
4.8%

Basic Materials

DRVG.L
13.4%
EBUY.L
0.0%

Communication Services

DRVG.L
5.7%
EBUY.L
13.1%

Consumer Defensive

DRVG.L

-

EBUY.L
0.0%

Energy

DRVG.L

-

EBUY.L
0.0%

Financial Services

DRVG.L

-

EBUY.L
7.9%

Healthcare

DRVG.L

-

EBUY.L
0.0%

Real Estate

DRVG.L

-

EBUY.L
0.0%

Utilities

DRVG.L

-

EBUY.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVG.L
DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

EBUY.L
EBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRVG.LEBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.36

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.03

1.73

+7.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.73

4.34

+21.39

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the EBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVG.L and EBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRVG.LEBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19

2.07

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.70

-0.40

Drawdowns

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, roughly equal to the maximum EBUY.L drawdown of -39.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVG.L and EBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRVG.LEBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.24%

-39.97%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-20.87%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

-23.63%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.72%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-15.28%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

8.33%

-4.66%

Volatility

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Amundi MSCI Digital Economy and Metaverse ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (EBUY.L) at 5.72%. This indicates that DRVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRVG.LEBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

5.72%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.39%

13.47%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.54%

17.49%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

21.31%

+3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

21.80%

+3.26%

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRVG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EBUY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRVG.L vs. EBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while EBUY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DRVG.L and EBUY.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EBUY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EBUY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRVG.L and 0.45% for EBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRVG.L and EBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer