DRV vs. SRET
DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - DRV tracks the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%) while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DRV returned -28.03%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SRET. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. DRV charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
DRV vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -29.68% return, which is significantly lower than SRET's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, DRV has underperformed SRET with an annualized return of -28.03%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively higher 0.86% annualized return.
DRV
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- -28.36%
- YTD
- -29.68%
- 1Y
- -24.84%
- 3Y*
- -21.19%
- 5Y*
- -15.39%
- 10Y*
- -28.03%
SRET
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.86%
DRV vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | -29.68% | -7.27% | -10.50% | -33.74% | 68.51% | -68.77% | -60.48% | -51.70% | 5.07% | -17.10% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.82% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRV and SRET is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | -0.73 |
The correlation between DRV and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRV vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
DRV
SRET
DRV vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRV | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.23 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 1.60 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 6.60 | -8.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRV vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SRET's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRV | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -66.98% | -33.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -9.48% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.55% | -18.87% | -53.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.91% | -29.43% | -45.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.48% | -66.98% | -30.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -21.25% | -78.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.76% | -22.47% | -75.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.61% | 2.29% | +14.32% |
Volatility
DRV vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 15.36% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 2.80%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRV | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.36% | 2.80% | +12.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.01% | 9.15% | +23.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.85% | 11.47% | +31.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.20% | 16.45% | +40.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.82% | 24.58% | +38.24% |
DRV vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRV vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than SRET's 7.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | 3.84% | 2.88% | 4.57% | 5.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.91% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRV and SRET have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRV has higher volatility (15.36%) compared to SRET (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 10-year performance, SRET leads with 0.86% vs -28.03% for DRV. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SRET has performed better with a 0.86% return vs -28.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for DRV.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 3.84% for DRV.
DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRV and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer