DRTHX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
DRTHX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Mar 29, 1972. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRTHX BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund | -8.60% | 15.96% | 39.07% | 24.01% | -23.10% | 26.71% | 24.21% | 34.01% | -4.54% | 15.01% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRTHX achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DRTHX having a 13.39% annualized return and FSKAX not far behind at 13.23%.
DRTHX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 6M
- -6.03%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRTHX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRTHX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
DRTHX
FSKAX
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRTHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.83 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.04 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 5.05 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRTHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.83 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.59 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.72 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.78 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRTHX and FSKAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
DRTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.64%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRTHX BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund | 11.64% | 10.63% | 17.93% | 3.41% | 12.94% | 4.19% | 3.13% | 2.31% | 4.74% | 26.74% | 5.37% | 15.21% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRTHX drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRTHX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRTHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.27% | -35.01% | -28.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -12.42% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -25.39% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | -35.01% | +3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.66% | -8.92% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -4.05% | -13.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.57% | +0.25% |
Volatility
DRTHX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRTHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 4.42% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 9.40% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 18.50% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 17.38% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 18.42% | -0.02% |