PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRSK vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.


DRSK

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
2.76%
6M
1.48%
1Y
6.68%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRSK vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and WNTR is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRSKWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.29

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

5.85

-3.48

DRSK vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-42.65%

+22.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-42.65%

+35.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-9.88%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-20.93%

+16.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

16.70%

-13.87%

Volatility

DRSK vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is 2.37%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that DRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSKWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

17.54%

-15.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

45.99%

-40.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.35%

52.83%

-44.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

53.10%

-45.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.06%

53.10%

-46.04%

DRSK vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRSK vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.66%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
96.66%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRSK and WNTR have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to DRSK (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 6.68% for DRSK. On fees, DRSK is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DRSK has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRSK is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 3.66% for DRSK.

DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRSK and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer