DRSK vs. PTIN
DRSK (Aptus Defined Risk ETF) and PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. DRSK is actively managed, while PTIN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRSK returned 2.33%/yr vs 6.71%/yr for PTIN. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DRSK charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PTIN.
Performance
DRSK vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.34% return.
DRSK
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 3.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.25%
PTIN
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 32.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.84M | $3.85M | $3.25M | |
| $300.58K | $334.58K | $457.99K |
DRSK vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 1.59% | 7.67% | 12.50% | 2.08% | -9.57% | 0.88% | 13.80% | 6.53% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 16.34% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | -0.56% | 6.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRSK and PTIN is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019 | 0.42 |
The correlation between DRSK and PTIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRSK vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank
DRSK
PTIN
DRSK vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRSK | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 2.80 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 10.30 | -9.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRSK vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and PTIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRSK | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.87% | -21.27% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -11.55% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.81% | -13.93% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -21.27% | +1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -2.02% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -7.56% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.13% | -0.19% |
Volatility
DRSK vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is 1.80%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRSK | PTIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 5.26% | -3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.25% | 15.77% | -10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.86% | 17.72% | -9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.45% | 14.74% | -7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 14.12% | -7.07% |
DRSK vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRSK vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison
DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than PTIN's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRSK Aptus Defined Risk ETF | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.31% | 3.57% | 1.93% | 2.64% | 5.69% | 3.04% | 2.62% |
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.18% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRSK and PTIN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DRSK (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs PTIN's -21.27%.
On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.71% vs 2.33% for DRSK. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, DRSK has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.71% return vs 2.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.
DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.18% for PTIN.
They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.66% for PTIN.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRSK and PTIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer