PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. ADME
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DRSK vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DRSK vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
-3.09%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
-3.05%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-17.42%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DRSK having a -3.09% return and ADME slightly higher at -3.05%.


DRSK

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
-5.22%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

ADME

1D
0.49%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-3.05%
6M
-2.83%
1Y
11.83%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DRSK vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRSK and ADME have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRSKADMEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

0.85

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

1.28

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

1.37

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.58

5.58

-4.00

DRSK vs. ADME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ADME Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and ADME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRSKADMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

0.85

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.52

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.54

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and ADME is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DRSK vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than ADME's 0.42% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.88%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%0.00%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.42%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and ADME.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKADMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-27.49%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-8.99%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-23.43%

+3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.14%

-4.98%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-8.05%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.21%

+0.45%

Volatility

DRSK vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) is 1.76%, while Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that DRSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DRSKADMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

4.04%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

7.60%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.08%

13.91%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.22%

12.87%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

14.45%

-7.45%