PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. ADME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRSK vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly lower than ADME's 10.24% return.


DRSK

1D
0.34%
1M
2.76%
YTD
4.10%
6M
2.54%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*

ADME

1D
0.39%
1M
4.08%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.30%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRSK vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
4.10%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
10.24%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and ADME is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.55

The correlation between DRSK and ADME shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRSK vs. ADME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRSK
ADME

Technology

35.6%
35.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.0%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

DRSK
35.6%
ADME
35.2%

Financial Services

DRSK
11.8%
ADME
11.9%

Communication Services

DRSK
11.2%
ADME
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DRSK
10.1%
ADME
10.2%

Healthcare

DRSK
8.5%
ADME
8.4%

Industrials

DRSK
8.3%
ADME
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

DRSK
4.9%
ADME
5.0%

Energy

DRSK
3.5%
ADME
3.6%

Utilities

DRSK
2.4%
ADME
2.3%

Real Estate

DRSK
1.9%
ADME
2.0%

Basic Materials

DRSK
1.8%
ADME
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRSKADMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.84

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

12.39

-9.51

DRSK vs. ADME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the ADME Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and ADME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRSKADMEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.14

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.65

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.63

+0.18

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and ADME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKADMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-27.49%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-7.49%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.60%

-15.67%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-23.43%

+3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.34%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-7.92%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.71%

+1.08%

Volatility

DRSK vs. ADME - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSKADMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.94%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

7.70%

-2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

9.95%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

12.87%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.06%

14.40%

-7.34%

DRSK vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRSK and ADME have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

DRSK vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than ADME's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.37%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.61%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRSK and ADME have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRSK has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to ADME (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs ADME's -27.49%.

On 5-year performance, ADME leads with 8.31% vs 3.13% for DRSK. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.31% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRSK and ADME have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DRSK has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.

DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ADME is Hedge Fund.

ADME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRSK and ADME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer