DRRIX vs. QMLFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DRRIX (BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, DRRIX returned 5.08%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for QMLFX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRRIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.

Performance

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRRIX achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 19.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DRRIX has underperformed QMLFX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while QMLFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.

DRRIX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 18.14%
• 3Y*: 10.14%
• 5Y*: 4.32%
• 10Y*: 5.08%

QMLFX

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 8.23%
• YTD: 19.70%
• 6M: 17.05%
• 1Y: 37.99%
• 3Y*: 13.85%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 10.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I	7.11%	12.60%	6.88%	2.59%	-8.47%	6.98%	9.75%	12.29%	1.12%	4.29%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	19.70%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	13.22%	37.81%	26.08%	-13.48%	16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DRRIX and QMLFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2013	0.56

The correlation between DRRIX and QMLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (10 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DRRIX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRRIX

DRRIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
DRRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DRRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DRRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DRRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DRRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRRIX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	1.89	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.47	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.33	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	3.86	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.68	11.38	+3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRRIX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRRIX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	1.89	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.03	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.51	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.42	+0.36

Drawdowns

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRRIX drawdown since its inception was -15.92%, smaller than the maximum QMLFX drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRRIX and QMLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRRIX	QMLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.92%	-36.59%	+20.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.64%	-10.07%	+5.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.55%	-27.21%	+16.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.29%	-36.59%	+22.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.92%	-36.59%	+20.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-1.02%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-12.53%	+9.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	3.41%	-2.15%

Volatility

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I (DRRIX) is 1.49%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that DRRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRRIX	QMLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	7.78%	-6.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.66%	14.43%	-8.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.20%	20.56%	-13.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	20.23%	-13.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.70%	20.98%	-14.28%

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRRIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRRIX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

DRRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than QMLFX's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRRIX BNY Mellon Global Real Return Fund - Class I	3.66%	3.92%	4.35%	0.05%	9.59%	1.65%	1.39%	2.79%	3.62%	0.88%	2.98%	4.46%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.15%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRRIX and QMLFX in my portfolio?

DRRIX and QMLFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRRIX or QMLFX?

QMLFX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to DRRIX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRRIX dropped -15.92% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.