DRNL vs. INTW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DRNL (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DRNL is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRNL charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

DRNL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF (DRNL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRNL

• 1D: -10.22%
• 1M: -46.95%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -11.89%
• 1M: -36.23%
• 6M: 160.20%
• YTD: 332.72%
• 1Y: 833.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRNL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRNL Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF	-75.76%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	225.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DRNL and INTW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

DRNL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRNL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 96
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRNL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF (DRNL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRNL	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.47	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.48	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	15.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	36.20	—

Drawdowns

DRNL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRNL drawdown since its inception was -77.39%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNL and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRNL	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.39%	-60.58%	-16.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-55.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.39%	-55.46%	-21.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.57%	-29.73%	-14.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRNL	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	52.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	123.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.22%	154.09%	-15.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.22%	149.56%	-11.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.22%	149.56%	-11.34%

DRNL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRNL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRNL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRNL nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRNL and INTW in my portfolio?

DRNL and INTW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRNL or INTW?

On fees, DRNL is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRNL or INTW?

DRNL is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRNL or INTW?

DRNL and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRNL and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DRNL and 1.50% for INTW.