DRNL vs. CRMG
DRNL (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DRNL is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRNL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
DRNL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRNL
- 1D
- -10.39%
- 1M
- -43.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -32.01%
- YTD
- -72.43%
- 6M
- -72.59%
- 1Y
- -75.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRNL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRNL Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF | -68.51% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -44.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRNL and CRMG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRNL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
DRNL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
DRNL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Drone & Aerial Automation ETF (DRNL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRNL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRNL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRNL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNL and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRNL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.63% | -79.83% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.63% | -79.83% | +9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.98% | -39.44% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 43.94% | — |
Volatility
DRNL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRNL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 141.57% | 75.86% | +65.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 141.57% | 75.19% | +66.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.57% | 75.19% | +66.38% |
DRNL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRNL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRNL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRNL nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DRNL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for DRNL.
DRNL and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for DRNL and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for DRNL and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer