DRN vs. FAS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DRN (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - DRN is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (300%), while FAS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DRN returned -4.83%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for FAS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRN charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.

Performance

DRN vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRN achieves a 23.49% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, DRN has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of -4.83%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.

DRN

• 1D: -4.47%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 23.49%
• 6M: 23.07%
• 1Y: 9.95%
• 3Y*: 7.81%
• 5Y*: -12.09%
• 10Y*: -4.83%

FAS

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: -19.73%
• 6M: -13.42%
• 1Y: -7.77%
• 3Y*: 35.48%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 19.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRN vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRN Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares	23.49%	-11.24%	-5.29%	12.03%	-67.26%	152.94%	-55.37%	81.86%	-25.11%	7.50%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	-19.73%	21.48%	84.47%	14.92%	-43.19%	116.59%	-34.97%	113.04%	-33.84%	67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DRN and FAS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2009	0.63

The correlation between DRN and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRN vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRN	FAS
Real Estate	19.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Technology	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRN vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRN

DRN Risk / Return Rank: 14
DRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DRN Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
DRN Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 8
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRN vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRN	FAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	-0.18	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	0.04	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.01	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	-0.19	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.91	-0.44	+1.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRN vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRN and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRN	FAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	-0.18	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	0.10	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	0.32	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.20	+0.01

Drawdowns

DRN vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRN drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRN and FAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRN	FAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.32%	-91.61%	+5.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.28%	-40.88%	+16.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.26%	-43.10%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.58%	-66.88%	-13.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.32%	-85.99%	-0.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.79%	-26.35%	-38.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.09%	-31.11%	-3.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.92%	17.73%	-6.81%

Volatility

DRN vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.20%. This indicates that DRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRN	FAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	12.20%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.87%	33.21%	-3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.83%	43.36%	-2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.73%	55.59%	+1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.66%	61.35%	-0.69%

DRN vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRN vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

DRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FAS's 10.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRN Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares	2.16%	2.81%	2.24%	2.84%	2.70%	4.21%	1.90%	2.59%	3.11%	0.91%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	10.39%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRN and FAS in my portfolio?

DRN and FAS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRN or FAS?

DRN has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to FAS (12.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRN dropped -86.32% vs FAS's -91.61%.

Which ETF is better, DRN or FAS?

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 19.57% vs -4.83% for DRN. On fees, DRN is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRN or FAS?

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 19.57% return vs -4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRN or FAS?

DRN is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRN or FAS?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.39%, compared with 2.16% for DRN.

What is the main difference between DRN and FAS?

DRN is categorized as REIT, while FAS is Leveraged Equities. DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRN and 1.00% for FAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.