PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DRMU.TO (Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and DRFD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRMU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Desjardins, while DRFD.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Desjardins. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRMU.TO returned 14.19%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for DRFD.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DRMU.TO having a 12.75% return and DRFD.TO slightly lower at 12.55%.

DRMU.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.63%
6M
10.65%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
—

DRFD.TO

1D
1.07%
1M
2.79%
6M
9.84%
YTD
12.55%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRMU.TO
Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.75%11.60%34.78%24.94%-16.67%26.25%20.57%24.54%-8.47%
DRFD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.55%30.23%16.52%12.80%-10.88%9.94%2.12%16.03%-8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DRMU.TO and DRFD.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018

0.15

Over the past year, DRMU.TO and DRFD.TO have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Return for Risk

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRMU.TO
DRMU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DRMU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO
DRFD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DRFD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRFD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU.TO) and Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRMU.TODRFD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.87
1.88

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.67
2.74

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.28

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

8.89

+0.42

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRMU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the DRFD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRMU.TO and DRFD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRMU.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, roughly equal to the maximum DRFD.TO drawdown of -25.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMU.TO and DRFD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRMU.TODRFD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-25.18%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-11.85%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.69%

-13.78%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.56%

-22.31%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.66%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-5.26%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.03%

-0.45%

Volatility

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRFD.TO) at 3.49%. This indicates that DRMU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRFD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRMU.TODRFD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.49%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

12.39%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

14.42%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

13.39%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

13.67%

+1.89%

Dividends

DRMU.TO vs. DRFD.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRMU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than DRFD.TO's 2.36% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRFD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada Multifactor - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		2.36%2.68%2.55%2.17%2.74%2.38%2.55%2.34%0.72%
DRMU.TO
Desjardins RI USA Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.78%0.85%0.77%1.04%1.17%1.08%1.25%1.34%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRMU.TO and DRFD.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRMU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DRFD.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRMU.TO and DRFD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer