DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO
DRMD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and ZLI.TO (BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRMD.TO returned 11.35%/yr vs 5.83%/yr for ZLI.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRMD.TO achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly higher than ZLI.TO's 5.64% return.
DRMD.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 24.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
ZLI.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRMD.TO Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 12.40% | 27.57% | 11.54% | 13.94% | -8.20% | 9.85% | 20.29% |
ZLI.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF | 5.64% | 13.39% | 11.93% | 9.09% | -9.80% | 6.79% | 9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRMD.TO and ZLI.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, DRMD.TO and ZLI.TO have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DRMD.TO
ZLI.TO
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) and BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRMD.TO | ZLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 0.82 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 1.94 | +6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.39%, smaller than the maximum ZLI.TO drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMD.TO and ZLI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRMD.TO | ZLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.39% | -24.66% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -8.37% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.40% | -8.37% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.39% | -24.66% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -2.28% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -4.99% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.55% | -0.65% |
Volatility
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLI.TO) at 2.00%. This indicates that DRMD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRMD.TO | ZLI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 2.00% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 8.50% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 10.40% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 10.86% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 12.22% | +1.66% |
Dividends
DRMD.TO vs. ZLI.TO - Dividend Comparison
DRMD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZLI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRMD.TO Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.27% | 1.86% | 2.45% | 2.04% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLI.TO BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF | 2.14% | 2.24% | 2.48% | 2.70% | 2.87% | 2.51% | 2.66% | 2.36% | 2.49% | 2.25% | 2.02% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRMD.TO and ZLI.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and BMO.
Find the right allocation for DRMD.TO and ZLI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer