PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DRMD.TO (Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) and FCIV.TO (Fidelity International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DRMD.TO is actively managed, while FCIV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRMD.TO returned 11.35%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for FCIV.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) and Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRMD.TO achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly lower than FCIV.TO's 18.43% return.

DRMD.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.89%
6M
7.82%
YTD
12.40%
1Y
24.44%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
—

FCIV.TO

1D
0.90%
1M
3.02%
6M
12.22%
YTD
18.43%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
16.30%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		12.40%27.57%11.54%13.94%-8.20%9.85%11.61%
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF		18.43%33.60%6.89%22.75%-0.22%14.15%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DRMD.TO and FCIV.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020

0.35

Over the past year, DRMD.TO and FCIV.TO have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF

Fidelity International Value ETF

Often compared with FCIV.TO:
FCIV.TO vs. FCIM.NEOFCIV.TO vs. VIDY.TOFCIV.TO vs. VI.TOFCIV.TO vs. FCID.TOFCIV.TO vs. VIU.TOFCIV.TO vs. XFN.TOFCIV.TO vs. VA.TO

Return for Risk

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRMD.TO
DRMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO
FCIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) and Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRMD.TOFCIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.80
2.37

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.51
3.14

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

4.06

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

15.22

-6.78

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRMD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FCIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRMD.TO and FCIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.39%, roughly equal to the maximum FCIV.TO drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRMD.TO and FCIV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRMD.TOFCIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.39%

-24.27%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-8.59%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.40%

-16.59%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.39%

-24.27%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-0.65%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-4.04%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.29%

+0.61%

Volatility

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMD.TO) and Fidelity International Value ETF (FCIV.TO) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRMD.TOFCIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

3.11%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

11.29%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.66%

14.73%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

15.24%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

15.49%

-1.61%

Dividends

DRMD.TO vs. FCIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

DRMD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DRMD.TO
Desjardins RI Developed ex-USA ex-Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF		0.00%0.00%12.27%1.86%2.45%2.04%1.64%
FCIV.TO
Fidelity International Value ETF		2.11%2.09%2.80%3.64%3.45%2.97%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRMD.TO and FCIV.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRMD.TO and FCIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer