PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRLL vs. STXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRLL vs. STXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly higher than STXT's -0.72% return.


DRLL

1D
1.39%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
20.68%
6M
21.93%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
12.27%
5Y*
10Y*

STXT

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRLL vs. STXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
20.68%7.74%0.02%-4.09%
STXT
Strive Total Return Bond ETF
-0.72%6.58%1.77%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLL and STXT is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023

-0.14

The correlation between DRLL and STXT shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRLL vs. STXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

STXT
STXT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
STXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
STXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLL vs. STXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRLLSTXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

0.87

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

2.34

+1.64

DRLL vs. STXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the STXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLL and STXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRLL vs. STXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than STXT's maximum drawdown of -5.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and STXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRLLSTXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-5.27%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.66%

-2.80%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.51%

-2.56%

-12.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-1.37%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

1.04%

+4.56%

Volatility

DRLL vs. STXT - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) at 1.39%. This indicates that DRLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRLLSTXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

1.39%

+6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.53%

2.94%

+15.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.82%

3.89%

+18.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

5.05%

+18.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

5.05%

+18.78%

DRLL vs. STXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than STXT's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRLL vs. STXT - Dividend Comparison

DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than STXT's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.54%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
STXT
Strive Total Return Bond ETF
4.74%4.93%5.15%1.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRLL and STXT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRLL has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to STXT (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLL dropped -23.73% vs STXT's -5.27%.

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 22.10% vs 2.43% for STXT. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, STXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 22.10% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for STXT.

STXT has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 2.54% for DRLL.

DRLL is categorized as Energy Equities, while STXT is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index, while STXT tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DRLL and 0.49% for STXT.

DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRLL and STXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer