DRLL vs. JHMB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) and JHMB (John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index, while JHMB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock. DRLL is passively managed, while JHMB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DRLL returned 12.95%/yr vs 5.12%/yr for JHMB. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. DRLL charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JHMB.

Performance

DRLL vs. JHMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 28.89% return, which is significantly higher than JHMB's 0.64% return.

DRLL

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 5.19%
• 6M: 22.16%
• YTD: 28.89%
• 1Y: 34.54%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHMB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -0.34%
• 6M: 0.10%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 1Y: 6.04%
• 3Y*: 5.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRLL vs. JHMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	28.89%	7.74%	0.02%	-1.84%	15.52%
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF	0.64%	7.89%	3.52%	7.21%	-3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLL and JHMB is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	-0.14

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DRLL and JHMB has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.14 to -0.36, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

DRLL vs. JHMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 50
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 41

JHMB

JHMB Risk / Return Rank: 54
JHMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JHMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JHMB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JHMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
JHMB Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLL vs. JHMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRLL	JHMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.60	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.42	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.28	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	2.01	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	5.34	-0.11

DRLL vs. JHMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLL Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the JHMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLL and JHMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRLL vs. JHMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than JHMB's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and JHMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRLL	JHMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.73%	-14.53%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.99%	-3.01%	-13.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.73%	-5.80%	-17.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.76%	-1.57%	-8.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.17%	-4.74%	-3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	1.13%	+5.48%

Volatility

DRLL vs. JHMB - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF (JHMB) at 1.19%. This indicates that DRLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRLL	JHMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.37%	1.19%	+5.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.51%	2.92%	+15.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.80%	3.80%	+19.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.81%	5.77%	+18.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.81%	5.77%	+18.04%

DRLL vs. JHMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRLL vs. JHMB - Dividend Comparison

DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than JHMB's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.35%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%	0.00%
JHMB John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF	4.76%	4.48%	4.88%	4.04%	4.17%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRLL and JHMB in my portfolio?

DRLL and JHMB have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRLL or JHMB?

DRLL has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to JHMB (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLL dropped -23.73% vs JHMB's -14.53%.

Which ETF is better, DRLL or JHMB?

On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 12.95% vs 5.12% for JHMB. On fees, JHMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRLL or JHMB?

Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRLL or JHMB?

JHMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRLL or JHMB?

JHMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 2.35% for DRLL.

What is the main difference between DRLL and JHMB?

DRLL is categorized as Energy Equities, while JHMB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Strive and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DRLL and 0.39% for JHMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.