DRLL vs. FTWO

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) and FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from Strive - DRLL tracks the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index while FTWO tracks the Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DRLL returned 23.80% vs 20.33% for FTWO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRLL charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FTWO.

Performance

DRLL vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 23.39% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 6.29% return.

DRLL

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -3.24%
• 6M: 19.33%
• YTD: 23.39%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 10.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTWO

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -1.45%
• 6M: 0.46%
• YTD: 6.29%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRLL vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	23.39%	7.74%	0.02%	-4.39%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	6.29%	43.06%	14.97%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLL and FTWO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between DRLL and FTWO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DRLL vs. FTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRLL	FTWO
Energy	99.2%	27.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	26.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	1.1%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	33.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	11.2%

Return for Risk

DRLL vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 35
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 36
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLL vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRLL	FTWO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.13	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.60	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.20	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.45	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	3.68	+0.06

DRLL vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLL and FTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRLL vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and FTWO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRLL	FTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.73%	-18.17%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.99%	-14.55%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.61%	-12.96%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-3.72%	-4.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	5.72%	+0.85%

Volatility

DRLL vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a higher volatility of 7.24% compared to Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) at 5.10%. This indicates that DRLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRLL	FTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.24%	5.10%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.39%	14.88%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.57%	18.72%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.77%	19.23%	+4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	19.23%	+4.54%

DRLL vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRLL vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than FTWO's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.46%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	0.95%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRLL and FTWO in my portfolio?

DRLL and FTWO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRLL or FTWO?

DRLL has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to FTWO (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLL dropped -23.73% vs FTWO's -18.17%.

Which ETF is better, DRLL or FTWO?

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 23.80% vs 20.33% for FTWO. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, FTWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRLL or FTWO?

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 23.80% return vs 20.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRLL or FTWO?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FTWO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRLL or FTWO?

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.95% for FTWO.

What is the main difference between DRLL and FTWO?

DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index, while FTWO tracks Bloomberg Natural Resources and Security Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DRLL and 0.49% for FTWO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.