PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRLL vs. FTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DRLL vs. FTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DRLL vs. FTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
33.59%7.74%0.02%-4.50%
FTWO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF
13.73%43.06%14.97%1.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 33.59% return, which is significantly higher than FTWO's 13.73% return.


DRLL

1D
-3.97%
1M
5.97%
YTD
33.59%
6M
33.26%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
10Y*

FTWO

1D
1.55%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
13.73%
6M
17.33%
1Y
50.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DRLL vs. FTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than FTWO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DRLL vs. FTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FTWO
FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRLL vs. FTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRLLFTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

2.27

-1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

2.89

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.82

-2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.63

16.05

-11.42

DRLL vs. FTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLL Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the FTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLL and FTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRLLFTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.27

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.47

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between DRLL and FTWO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DRLL vs. FTWO - Dividend Comparison

DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than FTWO's 0.99% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.29%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
FTWO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF
0.99%1.02%1.23%0.59%0.00%

Drawdowns

DRLL vs. FTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than FTWO's maximum drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and FTWO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DRLLFTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-18.17%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.37%

-13.63%

-5.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.47%

-6.87%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-3.14%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

3.24%

+3.51%

Volatility

DRLL vs. FTWO - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) at 6.31%. This indicates that DRLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DRLLFTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

6.31%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

14.86%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.41%

22.58%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

19.26%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.49%

19.26%

+4.23%