PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRLL vs. FMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRLL vs. FMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRLL achieves a 36.69% return, which is significantly higher than FMUB's 0.94% return.


DRLL

1D
0.80%
1M
14.19%
6M
21.14%
YTD
36.69%
1Y
44.82%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.77%

FMUB

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.59%
6M
0.32%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$463.62K$500.96K$563.89K
$1.86M$2.43M$1.70M

DRLL vs. FMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
36.69%16.26%
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
0.94%4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DRLL and FMUB is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

-0.22

The correlation between DRLL and FMUB shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRLL vs. FMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRLL vs. FMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRLLFMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.14

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

7.91

-1.64

DRLL vs. FMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRLL Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FMUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRLL and FMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRLL vs. FMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRLL drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than FMUB's maximum drawdown of -2.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRLL and FMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRLLFMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-2.74%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

-2.49%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-1.62%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-0.48%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.68%

0.67%

+6.01%

Volatility

DRLL vs. FMUB - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) at 0.86%. This indicates that DRLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRLLFMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

0.86%

+5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.75%

2.19%

+16.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

2.75%

+20.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

3.59%

+20.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.80%

3.59%

+20.21%

DRLL vs. FMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRLL has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRLL vs. FMUB - Dividend Comparison

DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FMUB's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.22%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
3.55%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRLL and FMUB have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRLL has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to FMUB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRLL dropped -23.73% vs FMUB's -2.74%.

On 1-year performance, DRLL leads with 44.82% vs 4.81% for FMUB. On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 44.82% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

FMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.22% for DRLL.

DRLL is categorized as Energy Equities, while FMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DRLL and 0.30% for FMUB.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRLL and FMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer