PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIWX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIWX achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than DRIQX's 3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIWX has outperformed DRIQX with an annualized return of 5.81%, while DRIQX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.48% annualized return.


DRIWX

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.53%
6M
1.52%
YTD
2.69%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
5.81%
ALL TIME*
6.40%

DRIQX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.44%
6M
1.84%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIWX
Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.69%9.89%5.12%10.05%-22.34%13.46%18.33%21.04%-7.35%15.68%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.01%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%14.08%-4.20%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIWX and DRIQX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.91

The correlation between DRIWX and DRIQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIWX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRIWX
DRIWX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DRIWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIWXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.90

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

7.47

-2.91

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIWX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIWX drawdown since its inception was -27.45%, which is greater than DRIQX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIWX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIWXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.45%

-19.86%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-3.47%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.07%

-5.12%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

-19.86%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.45%

-19.86%

-7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-1.30%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-3.84%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.88%

+0.71%

Volatility

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.10%. This indicates that DRIWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIWXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

1.10%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.71%

3.60%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.18%

4.52%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.67%

7.07%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.06%

6.58%

+3.48%

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIWX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

DRIWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than DRIQX's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.36%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%
DRIWX
Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
7.48%6.89%6.04%4.10%6.63%5.81%3.93%2.39%2.45%1.33%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DRIWX and DRIQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DRIWX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to DRIQX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIWX dropped -27.45% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

DRIQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIWX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer