DRIV vs. VOLT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Global Equities funds. DRIV is passively managed, while VOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, DRIV returned 72.16% vs 64.69% for VOLT. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRIV charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

DRIV vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 29.53% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 40.29% return.

DRIV

• 1D: -4.82%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: 29.53%
• 6M: 27.42%
• 1Y: 72.16%
• 3Y*: 17.21%
• 5Y*: 7.67%
• 10Y*: —

VOLT

• 1D: -3.50%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 40.29%
• 6M: 38.12%
• 1Y: 64.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIV vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	29.53%	30.42%	-1.88%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	40.29%	25.92%	-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and VOLT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.69

The correlation between DRIV and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRIV vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRIV	VOLT
Technology	37.3%	12.9%
Consumer Cyclical	25.3%	3.4%
Industrials	18.0%	47.0%
Basic Materials	13.7%	-
Communication Services	5.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	4.7%
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	31.0%

Return for Risk

DRIV vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 82
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 89
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIV	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.99	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	3.71	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.49	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.40	6.78	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.18	18.99	-1.81

DRIV vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than VOLT's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIV	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.93%	-23.40%	-18.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.43%	-9.59%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.90%	-3.50%	-6.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.07%	-5.14%	-9.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	3.42%	+0.79%

Volatility

DRIV vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) at 9.40%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIV	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.60%	9.40%	+4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.71%	18.29%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.63%	21.75%	+5.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.57%	24.55%	+3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.63%	24.55%	+3.08%

DRIV vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRIV vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than VOLT's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.83%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.32%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIV and VOLT in my portfolio?

DRIV and VOLT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRIV or VOLT?

DRIV has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to VOLT (9.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

Which ETF is better, DRIV or VOLT?

On 1-year performance, DRIV leads with 72.16% vs 64.69% for VOLT. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 9.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRIV or VOLT?

Over the 1-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 72.16% return vs 64.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRIV or VOLT?

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRIV or VOLT?

DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.32% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between DRIV and VOLT?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.75% for VOLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.