DRIV vs. AIQ
DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRIV returned 9.49%/yr vs 19.07%/yr for AIQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
DRIV vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 42.27% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's 35.98% return.
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -22.39% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIV and AIQ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DRIV and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRIV vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRIV
AIQ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRIV
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
DRIV
AIQ
Industrials
DRIV
AIQ
Basic Materials
DRIV
AIQ
-
Communication Services
DRIV
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
DRIV
-
AIQ
-
Energy
DRIV
-
AIQ
-
Financial Services
DRIV
-
AIQ
Healthcare
DRIV
-
AIQ
Real Estate
DRIV
-
AIQ
-
Utilities
DRIV
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIV vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
DRIV
AIQ
DRIV vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIV | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.49 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.92 | 4.22 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.10 | 14.59 | +9.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIV | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 3.02 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.76 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.84 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
DRIV vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIV | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.93% | -44.66% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -16.47% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.18% | -26.35% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.93% | -44.66% | +2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -1.40% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -9.80% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 4.76% | -0.91% |
Volatility
DRIV vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 8.60%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIV | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | 8.60% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 18.46% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.14% | 23.04% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 25.33% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 25.50% | +1.90% |
DRIV vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRIV and AIQ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
DRIV vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIV and AIQ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to AIQ (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 19.07% vs 9.49% for DRIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRIV and AIQ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
DRIV is categorized as Global Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRIV and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer