DRIV vs. AIQ

Last updated Jul 7, 2026

DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRIV returned 7.58%/yr vs 16.00%/yr for AIQ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

DRIV vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 27.45% return, which is significantly higher than AIQ's 25.52% return.

DRIV

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -2.37%
• 6M: 22.42%
• YTD: 27.45%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 14.61%
• 5Y*: 7.58%
• 10Y*: —

AIQ

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: 2.11%
• 6M: 22.65%
• YTD: 25.52%
• 1Y: 45.22%
• 3Y*: 32.35%
• 5Y*: 16.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIV vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	27.45%	30.42%	-5.04%	26.14%	-34.13%	27.80%	62.76%	28.54%	-21.49%
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	25.52%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	17.09%	52.88%	39.94%	-14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and AIQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.83

The correlation between DRIV and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DRIV vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRIV	AIQ
Technology	37.3%	77.4%
Consumer Cyclical	25.3%	7.2%
Industrials	18.0%	3.4%
Basic Materials	13.7%	-
Communication Services	5.7%	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRIV vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 77
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 60
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIV	AIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.68	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.17	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	2.76	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.33	8.45	+3.88

DRIV vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and AIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIV	AIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.93%	-44.66%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.44%	-16.47%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.18%	-26.35%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.93%	-44.66%	+2.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.34%	-8.98%	-2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-9.78%	-5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	5.37%	-0.70%

Volatility

DRIV vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) is 13.74%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 15.22%. This indicates that DRIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIV	AIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.74%	15.22%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.31%	23.43%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.10%	27.11%	+0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.69%	26.15%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.66%	25.89%	+1.77%

DRIV vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DRIV and AIQ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

DRIV vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than AIQ's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.07%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.58%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIV and AIQ in my portfolio?

DRIV and AIQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRIV or AIQ?

AIQ has higher volatility (15.22%) compared to DRIV (13.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

Which ETF is better, DRIV or AIQ?

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 16.00% vs 7.58% for DRIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, DRIV has been the lower-risk option at 13.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRIV or AIQ?

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 16.00% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRIV or AIQ?

DRIV and AIQ have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRIV or AIQ?

DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.07% for AIQ.

What is the main difference between DRIV and AIQ?

DRIV is categorized as Global Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.