PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIUX vs. PPLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIUX achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than PPLIX's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIUX has underperformed PPLIX with an annualized return of 4.60%, while PPLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.


DRIUX

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.22%
6M
1.16%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
4.60%
ALL TIME*
5.36%

PPLIX

1D
1.66%
1M
0.41%
6M
5.71%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
11.26%
ALL TIME*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIUX
Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.15%9.01%3.86%8.09%-20.98%9.26%17.45%18.97%-6.67%13.18%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
8.51%17.55%19.12%20.36%-18.78%17.04%16.56%26.67%-8.74%22.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIUX and PPLIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.62

The correlation between DRIUX and PPLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIUX vs. PPLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRIUX
DRIUX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DRIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PPLIX
PPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) and Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIUXPPLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.83

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

7.85

-3.28

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the PPLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIUX and PPLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIUX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, smaller than the maximum PPLIX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIUX and PPLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIUXPPLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.95%

-55.61%

+28.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-8.57%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.21%

-15.59%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-26.85%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.95%

-32.67%

+5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-0.86%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-8.26%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

2.00%

-0.72%

Volatility

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) is 1.37%, while Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund (PPLIX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that DRIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIUXPPLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

3.39%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

10.35%

-5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

12.57%

-6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.41%

15.60%

-6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.86%

15.55%

-6.69%

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIUX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIUX vs. PPLIX - Dividend Comparison

DRIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than PPLIX's 9.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIUX
Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
5.82%5.26%4.40%4.53%7.77%5.60%3.72%2.25%2.44%1.39%1.41%0.00%
PPLIX
Principal LifeTime 2050 Fund
9.17%9.95%11.56%4.41%9.40%8.04%5.23%7.16%8.64%5.12%4.82%6.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIUX and PPLIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPLIX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to DRIUX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIUX dropped -26.95% vs PPLIX's -55.61%.

PPLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIUX and PPLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer