PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIUX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIUX achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 14.99% return.


DRIUX

1D
0.52%
1M
1.04%
YTD
3.93%
6M
4.02%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
6.22%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
5.23%

FCTKX

1D
1.46%
1M
3.32%
YTD
14.99%
6M
15.03%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
11.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIUX
Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
3.93%9.01%3.86%8.09%-20.98%9.26%17.45%18.97%-6.67%6.25%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
14.99%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIUX and FCTKX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.62

The correlation between DRIUX and FCTKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIUX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIUX
DRIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DRIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIUXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.32

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

14.54

-6.08

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIUX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIUX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, smaller than the maximum FCTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIUX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIUXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.95%

-30.94%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-9.78%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.28%

-15.40%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-27.16%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

0.00%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-5.44%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

2.23%

-1.05%

Volatility

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) is 2.12%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that DRIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIUXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

5.83%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

11.74%

-7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

13.77%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.41%

15.22%

-5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

15.95%

-7.05%

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIUX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIUX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

DRIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, which matches FCTKX's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIUX
Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
5.08%5.26%4.40%4.53%7.77%5.60%3.72%2.25%2.44%1.39%1.41%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.09%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIUX and FCTKX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTKX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to DRIUX (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIUX dropped -26.95% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIUX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer