PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIP vs. NVIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIP vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIP achieves a -41.20% return, which is significantly lower than NVIR's 15.99% return.


DRIP

1D
-0.94%
1M
18.92%
YTD
-41.20%
6M
-40.68%
1Y
-42.23%
3Y*
-27.26%
5Y*
-38.71%
10Y*
-42.06%

NVIR

1D
-0.24%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
15.99%
6M
15.77%
1Y
26.56%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIP vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
-41.20%-14.81%1.27%-23.13%
NVIR
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF
15.99%9.84%17.53%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIP and NVIR is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023

-0.86

The correlation between DRIP and NVIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIP vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIP
DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NVIR
NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIP vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIPNVIRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.28

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

2.93

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

9.32

-10.57

DRIP vs. NVIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the NVIR Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIP and NVIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIP vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIP drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than NVIR's maximum drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIP and NVIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIPNVIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-22.47%

-77.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.18%

-9.09%

-53.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.02%

-22.47%

-53.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-7.99%

-91.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.46%

-4.61%

-85.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.75%

2.86%

+30.89%

Volatility

DRIP vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) has a higher volatility of 18.04% compared to Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) at 6.20%. This indicates that DRIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIPNVIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.04%

6.20%

+11.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.68%

12.76%

+30.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.75%

16.63%

+40.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.37%

19.32%

+49.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.33%

19.32%

+77.01%

DRIP vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIP has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVIR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIP vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison

DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than NVIR's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
3.36%2.86%4.38%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.96%0.58%
NVIR
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF
0.79%0.92%1.50%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIP and NVIR have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIP has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to NVIR (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIP dropped -99.95% vs NVIR's -22.47%.

On 3-year performance, NVIR leads with 18.04% vs -27.26% for DRIP. On fees, NVIR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, NVIR has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVIR has performed better with a 18.04% return vs -27.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVIR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.79% for NVIR.

DRIP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVIR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DRIP and 0.85% for NVIR.

NVIR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIP and NVIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer