DRIOX vs. YASLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX).
DRIOX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Sep 16, 2007. YASLX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jun 29, 2014.
Performance
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIOX Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund | -5.42% | 28.93% | 3.15% | 11.96% | -24.37% | 12.44% | 29.84% | 30.41% | -17.03% | 41.53% |
YASLX AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund | 7.56% | 6.27% | 11.23% | 3.65% | -13.59% | 24.45% | 12.82% | 17.07% | -10.15% | 34.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIOX achieves a -5.42% return, which is significantly lower than YASLX's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIOX has underperformed YASLX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while YASLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.
DRIOX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -14.47%
- YTD
- -5.42%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
YASLX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIOX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRIOX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank
DRIOX
YASLX
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIOX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.48 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 3.78 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIOX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.29 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.72 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.57 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIOX and YASLX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison
DRIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIOX Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.13% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 5.94% | 27.01% | 8.26% | 0.77% | 16.19% | 15.63% | 0.00% | 2.72% |
YASLX AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.82% | 8.97% | 0.94% | 3.85% | 2.62% | 12.95% | 9.89% | 4.86% | 3.28% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIOX drawdown since its inception was -59.68%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIOX and YASLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIOX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.68% | -38.91% | -20.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -10.18% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.73% | -27.74% | -19.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -38.91% | -8.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -4.89% | -9.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.41% | -8.34% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.78% | -0.08% |
Volatility
DRIOX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 3.18%. This indicates that DRIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRIOX | YASLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 3.18% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 8.66% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 12.99% | +4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 16.32% | +7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 15.00% | +5.76% |